#DeleteFacebook or forget privacy – that is the only choice


Facebook could be in legal trouble as parliaments call for action, for it has never asked authorization for what it would do with the user data.

Privacy violation to sway public opinion has been going on since Arab Springs. Seven years ago, Twitter held sway in Tunisia and Egypt, but WhatsApp and Facebook with video and image focus soon took over in the MENA region. All platforms collect user data and mine them extensively. All have violated privacy off and on, either directly or indirectly, to stay profitable.

The CA modus operandi
Cambridge Analytica, a London-based political consultancy and advertisement firm, collated user data from Facebook to augment its business for years. They have till date, data of 500 million people across the world including 220 million Americans. The US data was collected from Facebook through a simple app created by Alexandr Kogan, a Russian immigrant and lecturer at the University of Cambridge. The app was used to harvest Facebook profiles of over 90% of the US voters and was then analyzed into groups. For example, you could belong to a church-going group or a gun-loving group or a travel enthusiast group or a green group. The strategy company then created separate influencing strategies tailor-made to the psychographics of each group for the Trump presidential campaign.

Cambridge Analytica chief executive officer Alexander Nix told Bloomberg News last year that CA was involved in at least 10 global presidential or prime ministerial campaigns each year in Asia, Africa, Europe and America. The company was also employed in India once during the 2010 Bihar Assembly Elections. Also Cambridge Analytica is not the only company that uses profiles and activity tracking of social media users to create poll strategies. Most hot-shot advertisers and consultancies across the globe do so.

The Trump campaign
The current controversy surrounding Facebook and Cambridge Analytica just highlights a few of the dangers of big data. In a 4-month-old undercover sting operation by Channel 4 News that exposed the political advertising firm, Nix boasted on camera to potential clients from Sri Lanka that the firm used data analytics as well as old school dirty tricks to sway elections. This included sting operations and sending money and girls to lure or trap influencers or political opponents.

The sting operation by Channel 4 News against the masters of sting has political repercussions. Cambridge Analytica is partly funded by conservative hedge fund billionaire Robert Mercer in which Donald Trump’s former chief strategist Steve Banon holds a stake of nearly a million dollars. The Democratic Party is trying to prove that President Trump used unfair means to win the US elections and Cambridge Analytics indictment in privacy violation would help prove that.

Christopher Wyle, an independent whistleblower who worked on the Trump campaign, confirmed that specific data models were created to cater to the information about each voter and target their inner demons. As evidence the Canadian analyst who worked with FB till he was recently fired showed emails, invoices, contracts and bank transfer records of 85 million registered US voters to The Observer.

Facebook culpability and denial
Cambridge Analytica is just one of those data companies who act as a political influencers across the globe and operate through Facebook and other social media platforms. But it is not the only one. There are over 100,000 companies active on Facebook each day mining data of users and conducting similar activities with impunity. It is these companies who make Facebook the fastest growing company worldwide with eye-popping revenues of US$ 39.9 billion and revenue growth of 49%.

Facebook denied culpability first when the controversy broke, with Zuckerberg himself staying mum initially. But then the head of the British parliamentary committee Damian Collins investigating fake news accused both CA and Facebook of misleading British MP’s and summoned Zuckerberg and Nix to testify under oath. Revelations in The Observer further put the fat on fire and lawmakers around the world from US, EU, Singapore and even India have promised to take action against data misuse.

Facebook has been always a political tool
Facebook has always been a platform for both social influencers as well as politics. It has always been leveraged, fairly or unfairly, to influence political opinion—be it in democracies or autocracies. Saddam Hussain and Mummar Gaddafi were specifically targeted by NGOs based in Britain and France through social media. The user data from MENA nations were harvested and profiled to build anti-Saddam groups. Facebook has always intruded on privacy and the developers and analysts on Facebook have and will always sell user data.

True it asks users for permissions. But it is not possible for most users to know or deny knowledgeably, because it is fairly opaque in its terminology and verbose in its legal terms and conditions. Similar is the case with Google, Twitter, Instagram, WhatsApp or Snapchat. Such data is also meticulously mined and sold by your mobile phone operator. The problem is not collection of data. The problem is that they never ask authorization for what they will do with your private data. The laws today are not in place to prevent data abuse. It is the price of free digital platforms and digital connectivity that we all pay once we are connected.

Why Zuckerberg discounts effect of #DeleteFacebook
The #DeleteFacebook campaign started on Twitter soon after the scandal broke, and got immediate support from Brian Acton, co-founder of WhatsApp, retweeting the same. But the campaign did not take off as expected as Zuckerberg mounted a salvage operation. After his initial silence he opened up to give interviews to the tech media and others. In these interviews he clearly suggested that it was not Facebook’s fault that CA misused its data.

Realizing that the #DeleteFacebook movement would fade, Zuckerberg told the The New York Times, “I don’t think we’ve seen a meaningful number of people act on that.” But in the same breath he said he was sorry about the data breach and proposed to take preventive action.

As a matter of fact Zuckerberg had already started taking action much before the controversy became public. The FB platform had already lost 50 million users in the last quarter as fake news rose phenomenally. An operation to make FB more accountable disabled thousands of fake accounts. He also sold off 2.7 million shares from his personal stake in Facebook worth US$ 482 million, weeks before the scandal broke and the FB stock tanked 7%. No doubt some action will be taken, but it is highly unlikely that things will change radically and privacy concerns will be set to rest. It is likely that FB will resist external regulation and will only make those changes needed to save itself from legal liability and class action suits.

2023 promises an interesting ride for print in India

Indian Printer and Publisher founded in 1979 is the oldest B2B trade publication in the multi-platform and multi-channel IPPGroup. While the print and packaging industries have been resilient in the past 33 months since the pandemic lockdown of 25 March 2020, the commercial printing and newspaper industries have yet to recover their pre-Covid trajectory.

The fragmented commercial printing industry faces substantial challenges as does the newspaper industry. While digital short-run printing and the signage industry seem to be recovering a bit faster, ultimately their growth will also be moderated by the progress of the overall economy. On the other hand book printing exports are doing well but they too face several supply-chain and logistics challenges.

The price of publication papers including newsprint has been high in the past year while availability is diminished by several mills shutting down their publication paper and newsprint machines in the past four years. Indian paper mills are also exporting many types of paper and have raised prices for Indian printers. To some extent, this has helped in the recovery of the digital printing industry with its on-demand short-run and low-wastage paradigm.

Ultimately digital print and other digital channels will help print grow in a country where we are still far behind in our paper and print consumption and where digital is a leapfrog technology that will only increase the demand for print in the foreseeable future. For instance, there is no alternative to a rise in textbook consumption but this segment will only reach normality in the next financial year beginning on 1 April 2023.

Thus while the new normal is a moving target and many commercial printers look to diversification, we believe that our target audiences may shift and change. Like them, we will also have to adapt with agility to keep up with their business and technical information needs.

Our 2023 media kit is ready, and it is the right time to take stock and reconnect with your potential markets and customers. Print is the glue for the growth of liberal education, new industry, and an emerging economy. We seek your participation in what promises to be an interesting ride.

– Naresh Khanna

Subscribe Now


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here